![]() (2021), "A systematic literature review of process modeling guidelines and their empirical support", Business Process Management Journal, Vol. CitationĪvila, D.T., dos Santos, R.I., Mendling, J. ![]() ![]() Diego Toralles Avila was a CNPq scholarship holder and currently is a CAPES scholarship holder through the Programa de Apoio à Pós-Graduação (PROAP). requires external auditors to audit managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls and express an opinion on the companys internal control over financial reporting. This study was financed by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. Terms in this set (158) the process of defining business process requirements and evaluating potential improvements. This analysis provides guidance for practitioners and scholars on which guidelines to use while modeling a process and perform further research on. Compared to the prior literature reviews on process model quality and process modeling guidelines, this article extends current knowledge by analyzing the empirical evidence and variables associated with each guideline.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |